<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Archaeologists are in fact Anthropologists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theanthrogeek.com/2008/04/07/archaeologists-are-in-fact-anthropologists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theanthrogeek.com/2008/04/07/archaeologists-are-in-fact-anthropologists/</link>
	<description>The Study of Humanity’s Geekiest Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 02:46:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theanthrogeek</title>
		<link>http://theanthrogeek.com/2008/04/07/archaeologists-are-in-fact-anthropologists/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theanthrogeek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theanthrogeek.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kambiz makes a good point; I stand corrected!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kambiz makes a good point; I stand corrected!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kambiz Kamrani</title>
		<link>http://theanthrogeek.com/2008/04/07/archaeologists-are-in-fact-anthropologists/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kambiz Kamrani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theanthrogeek.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James,

The including of archaeology as a sub-discipline in anthropology is really only a &quot;western&quot; thing. Many Europeans distinguish archaeology and anthropology as two different fields. Sounds crazy, I know... 

But, that being said, for you to say NPR&#039;s journal Andrea Seabrook blundered on identifying the distinction is a bit flawed given the fact she was reporting on a &lt;em&gt;European&lt;/em&gt; site, Stonehenge.

Kambiz]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>The including of archaeology as a sub-discipline in anthropology is really only a &#8220;western&#8221; thing. Many Europeans distinguish archaeology and anthropology as two different fields. Sounds crazy, I know&#8230; </p>
<p>But, that being said, for you to say NPR&#8217;s journal Andrea Seabrook blundered on identifying the distinction is a bit flawed given the fact she was reporting on a <em>European</em> site, Stonehenge.</p>
<p>Kambiz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarsen56</title>
		<link>http://theanthrogeek.com/2008/04/07/archaeologists-are-in-fact-anthropologists/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sarsen56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theanthrogeek.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just a plain old archaeologist…. With a Wordpress site, I don’t feel like a sub-faculty, but I like the look of that pub in the picture, if that’s where anthropologists meet I’d give it a go.

http://www.sarsen56.wordpress.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just a plain old archaeologist…. With a WordPress site, I don’t feel like a sub-faculty, but I like the look of that pub in the picture, if that’s where anthropologists meet I’d give it a go.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sarsen56.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sarsen56.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

